Comments on: Prism and XUL Could Have Been A Silverlight And Adobe AIR Killer http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/ Tech & Design Fri, 16 May 2008 05:34:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Jeff Schilders http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-20488 Jeff Schilders Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:40:08 +0000 http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-20488 There are a lot of site where you will find XUL examples and documentation. http://www.xulplanet.com. If you want to make standalone XUL applications you can use xulrunner. A very nice XUL desktop application is songbird see more applications on http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XULRunner_Hall_of_Fame There are a lot of site where you will find XUL examples and documentation. http://www.xulplanet.com. If you want to make standalone XUL applications you can use xulrunner. A very nice XUL desktop application is songbird see more applications on http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XULRunner_Hall_of_Fame

]]> By: Ben http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-18153 Ben Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:21:50 +0000 http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-18153 I don't find that XUL itself is hard to learn. It's what you do after your GUI has been created. Integrating process interaction, file I/O, and server interaction is a nightmare. I don’t find that XUL itself is hard to learn. It’s what you do after your GUI has been created. Integrating process interaction, file I/O, and server interaction is a nightmare.

]]> By: Scott Fitchet http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-15982 Scott Fitchet Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:39:36 +0000 http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-15982 It's a shame. I've been disappointed about the lack of documentation. Try XUL Explorer : http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XUL_Explorer It’s a shame.

I’ve been disappointed about the lack of documentation.

Try XUL Explorer :

http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XUL_Explorer

]]> By: Alan http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-15236 Alan Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:09:33 +0000 http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-15236 I have just started on a XUL project and I have so far been facing the same issue regarding the availability of 'proper' XUL documentation. So, just out of interest, where do you guys get your XUL information? I have just started on a XUL project and I have so far been facing the same issue regarding the availability of ‘proper’ XUL documentation. So, just out of interest, where do you guys get your XUL information?

]]> By: Arpit Jacob http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-12709 Arpit Jacob Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:55:10 +0000 http://www.clazh.com/prism-and-xul-could-have-been-a-silverlight-and-adobe-air-killer/#comment-12709 Anirudh » You are absolutely right. I forgot to mention that XUL is very hard to learn and work with. Like I mention XUL has a lot of potential but Mozilla seems pretty blind about it. Yep AIR has a lot of potential. Anirudh » You are absolutely right. I forgot to mention that XUL is very hard to learn and work with. Like I mention XUL has a lot of potential but Mozilla seems pretty blind about it.

Yep AIR has a lot of potential.

]]>