<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FastCGI for IIS is Released, PHP On IIS Faster Than On Apache</title>
	<link>http://www.clazh.com/fastcgi-for-iis-is-released-php-on-iis-faster-than-on-apache/</link>
	<description>Tech &#038; Design</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terence Chang</title>
		<link>http://www.clazh.com/fastcgi-for-iis-is-released-php-on-iis-faster-than-on-apache/#comment-9920</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.clazh.com/fastcgi-for-iis-is-released-php-on-iis-faster-than-on-apache/#comment-9920</guid>
		<description>WOW! Finally the stuff I am waiting for! PHP is always running fast on linux as far as I can tell. Now I will be able to host my own PHP apps on my existing windows servers! 

Great thanks for sharing the news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! Finally the stuff I am waiting for! PHP is always running fast on linux as far as I can tell. Now I will be able to host my own PHP apps on my existing windows servers! </p>
<p>Great thanks for sharing the news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arpit Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.clazh.com/fastcgi-for-iis-is-released-php-on-iis-faster-than-on-apache/#comment-9903</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpit Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.clazh.com/fastcgi-for-iis-is-released-php-on-iis-faster-than-on-apache/#comment-9903</guid>
		<description>Do a Google even some of the PHP guys admit PHP is faster on IIS, plus remember the link I gave you is more than a year old when Fastcgi was not officially supported by Microsoft. Now its officially supported. 

Regarding permalinks yeah that sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a Google even some of the PHP guys admit PHP is faster on IIS, plus remember the link I gave you is more than a year old when Fastcgi was not officially supported by Microsoft. Now its officially supported. </p>
<p>Regarding permalinks yeah that sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.clazh.com/fastcgi-for-iis-is-released-php-on-iis-faster-than-on-apache/#comment-9900</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.clazh.com/fastcgi-for-iis-is-released-php-on-iis-faster-than-on-apache/#comment-9900</guid>
		<description>interesting.  I'd be much more convinced by speed tests preformed by someone other than microsoft.  
&lt;blockquote&gt;running it in this way usually leads to crashes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
makes it sound like it only runs that fast at the expense of stability.

The main reason I moved off of an IIS host was the absurd complexity of trying to get SEO-friendly url's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting.  I&#8217;d be much more convinced by speed tests preformed by someone other than microsoft.  </p>
<blockquote><p>running it in this way usually leads to crashes.</p></blockquote>
<p>makes it sound like it only runs that fast at the expense of stability.</p>
<p>The main reason I moved off of an IIS host was the absurd complexity of trying to get SEO-friendly url&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
